Last weekend’s magazine in the New York Times ran a feature about sexual desire among women, and its Lack. It focused on the work of a psychologist named Lori Brotto who has been charged with revising the description of the “mental illness” known as hypoactive (low) sexual desire disorder (HSDD) for the bible of psychology, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, aka the DSM.
I should probably note that I believe the DSM is one of the most destructive of human creations, right up there with uzis and DDT, and about as useful in helping people feel/function better as a sieve is for carrying water. I like what philosopher Rob Brezny says about it: “this ultimate word on the state of the human psyche describes countless pathological states, but there’s not a single entry referring to good mental health.” The NYT article expresses its own doubts about the usefulness of a manual that declared homosexuality a mental disorder as late as 1973 and is written by shrinks who routinely receive money from the pharmaceutical companies that profit from selling pills that treat most everything declared a disease by the DSM.
But the fact is that many women report feeling distress over low sexual desire: 1 in 10 in the US, according to a study of 30,000 women conducted in 2006; a smaller study done with 3500 women in Europe and the US reported 6-13% prevalence in Europe and 12-19% in the US. Even allowing for the possibility, as I do, that these studies are bogus and primarily intended to show a market for pharmaceuticals, I know from my friends and my own experience that lack of female libido can cause problems.
What I did find interesting about Brotto’s work is her focus on mindfulness. Because “an underlying theory is that while her patients’ genitals commonly pulse with blood in response to erotic images or their partners’ sexual touch, their minds are so detached — distracted by work or children or worries about the way they look unclothed, or fixated on fears that their libidos are dead — as to be oblivious to their bodies’ excitement, their bodies’ messages.” It’s nothing new to hear or believe that sex drive is affected by all those things (stress, lack of time, mass-media-influenced body image issues); what’s newer is the idea that our bodies are actually sexually activated despite all those factors, but our heads don’t get the message, and so we don’t feel turned on.
As part of her experiments with mindfulness therapy (which is based on the successful model of cognitive-behavioral therapy, consciously “altering patterns of thought to transform self-image and experience”), Brotto describes very deliberately infusing a yoga session with sexual energy—envisioning her breath transmitting sexual energy throughout her body, repeating a mantra in her head that she was a highly sexual woman—and how strong the reaction was: undeniable erotic power coursing through her. And that, of course, made me think of hooping. Specifically I thought of Christabel’s hoopsexy classes and jam sessions, in which she guides her students to focus on the sensuality of every part of their being, their body, their movements. I thought of Baxter telling me that the greatest blessing of his teaching is watching women remember their desirability. And own it.
In the HOOPING book we cite some of the physical reasons why hooping improves sex drive: blood flow to the pelvis, stimulation of the nerves in that area and the sacral chakra, and we quote prominent women’s health practitioner Dr. Christiane Northrup, a hooper herself, who writes “women with strong, healthy pelvic muscles tend to have more fulfilling sexual functioning with better pelvic blood flow, better vaginal lubrication, and stronger orgasms.”
Separately we talk about how hooping quiets the mind and assists the connection between body-mind-spirit. But if Brotto’s notion of mindfulness therapy is useful—and it seems kinda well duh to me—then that also figures in. It means hooping increases the mind’s ability to feel the body’s sexual responsiveness.
All of this also made me think of the “anti-sexy” crowd in hooping, the practitioners who feel that hooping has been associated for too long with women gyrating suggestively in revealing outfits, and that the focus on sexyness does hooping a disservice. Hooping, they contend, is a serious movement form that requires rigorous study, or, for some, a squeaky clean fitness regime. I understand and appreciate their quests to legitimize hooping.
But I guess I want to cheer on the presence of sex within the culture of hooping. (We could leave behind the furry bootcovers with bikinis, though.)
+
A word to newbies: It’s not rare that I teach someone to hoop and, after the initial euphoria of just keeping the hoop in orbit has faded, they complain: “but I look goofy/stupid.” “Why is it that you/HoopGirl/insert favorite hooper’s name here- look sexy when you do it, and I look like a dork?” So here’s the thing. The fact that you’re saying that means your brain is talking and judging and existing in disconnect from your body and it’s time for you to shut your brain up. Or as Christabel would more lovingly say, focus on your breathing and the sensation of the hoop on your body. Try closing your eyes. Hoop in private so, if you’re prone to worrying so much about what the world thinks, there’s no one there to see. It’s not about LOOKING sexy, it’s about FEELING sexy. A distinction that sounds so simple and obvious, yet its actualization can be pretty elusive–and then powerful, once grasped.




and arrived the day before World Hoop Day as a surprise gift from my bestest Berlin girlfriend (bbg?) Uta. It seemed obvious I was supposed to don it for WHD. Since it’s yellow with day-glo orange, I decided to go all the way with the 






